| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Reidy
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 960 Location: Northern CA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Palli
Joined: 12 Jul 2011 Posts: 179 Location: Oberlin, Ohio
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Christie perfs were removed at some point in the house history and the photos in this archive are the only evidence I have seen to show the original built perf design. G.N. found this reference for me in the Communications: Howe wrote Wright telling him "The present perorated board pattern for the Christie House is stupid. Would you send a sketch for another?"
Though difficult to read the photos on the web, this is a developed perf design and as it was designed during construction and presumably sent to Howe, it may have no remaining paper record. These photos are crucial.
I will contact the Heritage Auction House for better clarification but, needless to say I'm not a prospective buyer. Perhaps someone may be viewing these sheets before 4/10? If so please contact me on this thread.
The Taliesin Perf Project |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Reidy
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 960 Location: Northern CA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PrairieMod
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 345 Location: www.prairiemod.com
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's some screen grabs of the perfs:
 _________________ PrairieMod
www.prairiemod.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Roderick Grant
Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 3944
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I saw Christie in 2002. There were no perfs at that time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DRN
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 1549 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll have to look for my 1982-83 pictures and see if the perfs were present then. I wonder what became of them when they were removed? There would be a lot of them...did each sash have an interior and exterior board? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Myers
Joined: 22 Feb 2009 Posts: 1741 Location: Tulsa
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
The MOMA house (project) perf wow they aren't there from what I have seen I wonder what happened to them _________________ JAT
Jeff T |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wrighter
Joined: 09 Sep 2005 Posts: 311 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Can we assume that Howe knew that Wright himself didn't draw the perf design that Howe calls "stupid"? Or did he have that kind of relationship/liberty with the boss? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Roderick Grant
Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 3944
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| According to many conversations with Geiger, FLW was not fond of Jack. He was a useful apprentice, but the old man just didn't like him. I doubt Jack, who was intimidated by FLW, would have said such a thing if he had thought for a moment that FLW had designed the perfs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Palli
Joined: 12 Jul 2011 Posts: 179 Location: Oberlin, Ohio
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks all...Another cog in the wheels of my Taliesin perf assumptions.
Prairemod, your screen grab enlargements confirmed my suspicion:
The Christie House once sported the almost same perforated board design that was drawn on the plans of the MoMA Exhibition House Project.
Dan, I am anxious to hear about your 80s photos. To answer your question of the number of perfs:
judging from the MONO drawing two lantern clerestories had at least 22 2X4 perfs and some smaller corner perfs; perfs are marked on each elevation.
Does anyone know the detailed lineage of the House?
Last edited by Palli on Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:29 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Palli
Joined: 12 Jul 2011 Posts: 179 Location: Oberlin, Ohio
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Reidy, I still can't get your citations to work for me...and I do so want to see them...
Can you post them by chance or send another url?
it reads this for me:
incomplete request
sink not found |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Palli
Joined: 12 Jul 2011 Posts: 179 Location: Oberlin, Ohio
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll send a worksheet to SDR to post for comparison of the perfs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Reidy
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 960 Location: Northern CA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Palli
Joined: 12 Jul 2011 Posts: 179 Location: Oberlin, Ohio
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| reidy, thanks...I am inept |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DRN
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 1549 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Palli.
I'll try to dig up my Christie pics this evening.
In the mean time, I recalled that the Tarantino's (architects, owners of the Bachman-Wilson house) had done some work at Christie. On their website home page, click on "PRESERVATION", then "FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT", then "CHRISTIE HOUSE". Scroll through the pictures to pic 5 SANCTUM. There are perfs visible.
Their website: http://www.tarantinostudio.com/
It may be worth contacting the Tarantino's to ask about the Christie perf history and typology. I've never met them, but they have done a significant amount of good work for "the cause". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|